Dan Theodor Andronic1 and Aurel Mihail Titu2,3
Abstract. Managing imaging assessment criteria in pediatric cases requires a multidisciplinary approach that considers the unique developmental aspects of a child’s brain and the ethical and legal implications of imaging data. This article examines the challenges and opportunities related to medical imaging techniques in pediatric neurosurgery, highlighting the need for transparent and standardized protocols for data collection, analysis, and interpretation, while adhering to principles of intellectual property protection. The study emphasizes aligning imaging assessment criteria with the specific needs of pediatric patients, considering the variability of anatomy and physiology across different age groups. It analyzes how various imaging techniques (MRI, CT) influence diagnosis, surgical planning, and postoperative monitoring. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are explored, with attention to radiation exposure, acquisition time, and costs. A key focus is the approach to protecting intellectual property related to imaging data use. The importance of complying with current legislation on medical data confidentiality and the need to establish effective mechanisms to manage copyright and other intellectual property rights involved in developing and using image processing algorithms are discussed. This article provides a comprehensive view on managing imaging evaluation criteria in pediatric neurosurgery, emphasizing the need for an integrated approach that ensures diagnostic accuracy, treatment effectiveness, and adherence to principles of intellectual property rights and patient confidentiality. The main contribution is proposing a conceptual and practical framework to optimize imaging assessment processes according to the highest ethical and scientific standards.
KEYWORDS: Pediatric imaging, neurosurgery, standardized protocols, intellectual property, medical confidentiality, patient safety.
DOI 10.56082/annalsarscieco.2025.3.4
1National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania, ORCID No. 0009-0006-5648-8203, andronic_danth@yahoo.com
2Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania, Corresponding author, ORCID No. 0000-0002-0054-6535, mihail.titu@ulbsibiu.ro
3Academy of Romanian Scientists, 3 Ilfov Street, Bucharest, Romania
PUBLISHED in Annals Academy of Romanian Scientists Series on Economy, Law, Sociology, Volume 8 no 3, 2025