Annals of the Academy of Romanian Scientists  
Series on Agriculture, Silviculture and Veterinary Medicine  
Volume 15, Number 1/2025  
ISSN 2344-2085  
80  
DIVERSIFYING FARMERS' LIVELIHOODS THROUGH  
GASTRONOMY AND TOURISM ACTIVITIES  
TO INCREASE TECHNOLOGICAL, ECONOMIC,  
ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL RESILIENCE:  
CASE STUDY SIBIU COUNTY, ROMANIA  
Mirela STANCIU1, Cristina DANCIU2, Agatha POPESCU3  
Abstract. Small farms need technological, economic and social consolidation to reduce  
their vulnerability to current and future challenges, to be efficient and sustainable. In this  
context, the paper aims to present examples of good practices, which in addition to  
agricultural activity, traditionally process the obtained raw material, carry out services in  
the field of public catering and receive visitors for educational purposes. These farms  
integrate technology into current activity, contribute to the dissemination of knowledge  
related to traditional agricultural practices and local gastronomy. At the same time, they  
play an essential role in the conservation of landscapes and biodiversity and support and  
ensure farmers.  
Keywords: diversification, resilience, traditional farming, local gastronomy, rural  
tourism, farm open to visitors  
DOI  
10.56082/annalsarsciagr.2026.1.80  
1.Introduction  
Rural tourism and local gastronomy in Romania have received increasing  
academic and practical attention, reflecting their importance for sustainable  
regional development and cultural heritage preservation [7, 20, 34]. The  
integration of traditional foods, culinary heritage, and local gastronomic  
experiences into rural tourism is seen as a vital strategy for differentiating rural  
destinations, fostering community-based development, and enhancing visitor  
1
Prof., PhD, Eng. Habil.,”Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences,  
Food Industry and Environmental Protection, Romania, Associate Member of Academy of  
Romanian Scientists (e-mail: mirela.stanciu@ulbsibiu.ro).  
2
Assoc. Prof., PhD, Eng., ”Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences,  
Food Industry and Environmental Protection, Romania, (e-mail: cristina.danciu@ulbsibiu.ro).  
3
Prof. PhD, Eng. Ec., University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of  
Management and Rural Economy, Full member of Academy of Romanian Scientists,  
Corresponding member of the "Gheorghe Ionescu-Sisesti" Academy of Agricultural and Forestry  
Sciences, (e-mail: agatha.popescu@yahoo.com)  
     
Diversifying Farmers' Livelihoods Through Gastronomy and Tourism Activities  
to Increase Technological, Economic, Environmental and Social Resilience:  
Case Study Sibiu County, Romania  
81  
satisfaction [11, 35]. Romania’s diverse rural landscapes and rich culinary  
traditions have positioned the country as a promising destination for experiential  
tourism, especially as both domestic and international tourists seek authentic, off-  
the-beaten-path experiences [24, 30].  
Diversification of farmers’ livelihoods through gastronomy and tourism activities  
is increasingly recognized as a multidimensional strategy to enhance  
technological, economic, environmental, and social resilience in rural  
communities [6, 16, 38]. Economic gains, social cohesion, environmental  
adaptation, and technological innovation are tightly interlinked, producing a  
holistic model of rural transformation.  
By integrating culinary innovation, agritourism, and sustainable tourism practices,  
farmers can create new income streams, preserve local culture, and foster  
community well-being [14, 25].  
The aim of this study is to highlight the role of farm diversification in enhancing  
farm resilience and improving rural livelihoods through integration into rural  
tourism, agritourism, and gastronomic tourism, using Sibiu County as a case  
study.  
Literature review  
Farm Diversification  
Farm diversification represents a key strategy for enhancing the resilience,  
sustainability, and competitiveness of agricultural holdings across Europe,  
including Romania, in the context of global market pressures, agricultural  
policies, and rural development requirements [9, 31]. Diversification may take  
various forms, including the development of agritourism, the introduction of non-  
agricultural activities, the adoption of agroecological production systems, and the  
integration of community-oriented services. These approaches constitute adaptive  
responses to market instability and changes in public policies [31].  
In the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, including Romania and Serbia,  
small-scale farms predominate and make a significant contribution to social  
cohesion and the maintenance of rural livelihoods. However, they remain  
particularly vulnerable to economic shocks and changes in agricultural policy  
frameworks [13]. Consequently, farm diversification has emerged as an important  
strategy for strengthening economic viability and long-term sustainability.  
Diversification can take multiple forms, as presented in Table 1.  
82  
Mirela Stanciu, Cristina Danciu, Agatha Popescu  
Table 1. Categories and types of activities as forms of diversification of farm activity. Source:  
Adapted and synthesized by the authors based on the literature review  
Category of Activities  
Examples of Activities  
Niche crops: cultivation of medicinal and aromatic plants or  
mushrooms.  
Organic production: adoption of organic farming systems to  
produce healthier food products and obtain higher market prices.  
Agricultural and Production  
Diversification  
Integrated livestock production: livestock systems  
emphasizing animal welfare, biodiversity conservation, and the  
on-farm utilization of feed resources.  
Extended crop rotation: cultivation of three to four crops to  
comply with environmental requirements and agri-environmental  
schemes.  
Primary processing: establishment of facilities for sorting and  
washing vegetables and fruits.  
Secondary processing: production of jams, natural juices,  
preserves, cheeses, and bakery products.  
Processing and Value  
Addition  
Own-brand development: creation of a local brand for direct  
marketing to final consumers, thereby shortening the supply  
chain.  
Accommodation and catering: operation of agritourism  
guesthouses or local gastronomic points offering farm-based  
products.  
Agritourism and  
Recreational Services  
Recreational activities: organization of craft workshops,  
product tastings, horseback riding, and nature-based excursions.  
Educational farms: provision of educational programs for  
schools, camps, and guided visits for children.  
Mechanized services: provision of agricultural services (soil  
cultivation, harvesting, transportation) to other farms.  
Renewable energy production: installation of photovoltaic  
Services and Complementary panels on farm buildings or establishment of biogas facilities  
Activities  
using animal manure.  
Direct sales: operation of farm-gate shops or organization of  
“Pick-Your-Own” events, allowing consumers to harvest fruits  
directly from the farm.  
Farm Resilience  
At the European level, significant regional disparities can be observed in the  
structure and performance of farms, particularly regarding the specific  
vulnerabilities affecting Eastern and South-Eastern Europe [13]. At the same time,  
Diversifying Farmers' Livelihoods Through Gastronomy and Tourism Activities  
to Increase Technological, Economic, Environmental and Social Resilience:  
Case Study Sibiu County, Romania  
83  
the development of related sectors, such as agritourism, depends on the complex  
interaction between public policies and regional economic conditions [2].  
Farm resilience has become a strategic objective for European agriculture,  
especially in the context of increasing economic, social, and environmental  
sustainability challenges, as well as structural differences among Member States,  
including Romania [26]. Agriculture continues to be a cornerstone of the  
Romanian rural economy, playing a crucial role in ensuring food security and  
supporting the sustainable development of rural areas [17].  
The literature highlights the need for differentiated agricultural policies and the  
strengthening of the social and economic capital of Romanian farms in order to  
enhance their resilience to current and future challenges [13, 26]. At the same  
time, technological adaptation and modernization, the diversification of  
agricultural activities (such as agritourism), and the reduction of dependence on  
subsidies are recognized as key elements of sustainable rural development [2,17].  
Economic resilience can be strengthened through the efficient management of  
natural capital, the adoption of diversification strategies, the assessment of real  
production costs, and the integration of green economy principles and digital  
technologies into farm management [18, 36]. Policies that promote innovation,  
technology transfer, and human capital development can generate positive effects  
on the competitiveness and sustainability of the agricultural sector [8].  
Enhancing the economic resilience of farms represents a central objective for the  
agricultural sector, as it is essential for ensuring sustainability, adaptability, and  
competitiveness in the face of environmental, social, and market-related changes  
[18]. Economic resilience refers to the ability of farms to manage risks, adapt to  
crises, and maintain long-term profitability through innovative strategies and the  
efficient use of resources [8, 36].  
Social Resilience: Community services provided by farms are becoming an  
increasingly important component of sustainable rural development, with a direct  
impact on social cohesion, economic diversification, and the revitalization of rural  
areas [15, 23]. Beyond agricultural production, these services may include social,  
educational, food-related, recreational, and innovation-oriented activities, often  
supported by social and solidarity economy models [15]. As a result, farms  
perform multifunctional roles that contribute significantly to reducing inequalities  
and enhancing community resilience [4].  
Farm-based community services are essential for integrated rural development.  
They promote social inclusion, economic diversification, and local innovation [15,  
23]. The active involvement of farms in the provision of social, educational, and  
food-related services, in partnership with public authorities and local  
communities, can help reduce territorial disparities and strengthen rural resilience  
[4, 5].  
84  
Mirela Stanciu, Cristina Danciu, Agatha Popescu  
Environmental Resilience: Environmental resilience is another fundamental  
dimension of farm sustainability and refers to the capacity of agricultural systems  
to withstand, adapt to, and recover from environmental disturbances while  
maintaining  
their  
productive  
and  
ecological  
functions.  
Strengthening  
environmental resilience requires the sustainable management of natural  
resources, the conservation of biodiversity, the adoption of agroecological  
practices, and the reduction of environmental pressures associated with  
agricultural production.  
Diversified farming systems are generally more resilient to climate-related risks,  
market fluctuations, and ecological disturbances than highly specialized systems.  
Practices such as crop diversification, extended crop rotations, integrated crop–  
livestock systems, organic farming, and the preservation of landscape features  
contribute to enhancing ecosystem services and reducing environmental  
vulnerability. Furthermore, the development of short supply chains and  
community-oriented services can strengthen the relationship between farms and  
local ecosystems, supporting both environmental sustainability and rural  
resilience in the long term.  
Local gastronomy and rural tourism in Romania  
The literature demonstrates that rural tourism and local gastronomy in Romania  
are interdependent forces driving sustainable development, cultural preservation,  
and economic growth in rural areas [10, 33, 37]. The sector’s future success  
depends on strategic marketing, investment in infrastructure, stakeholder  
collaboration, and leveraging digital tools.  
Integration of gastronomy with rural tourism supports local economies, reduces  
depopulation, and preserves intangible cultural heritage [24, 32].  
Traditional Romanian food products are widely consumed and valued,  
contributing to the sustainability of rural areas and the development of a circular  
economy [27, 30].  
Open Farms for Visitors  
Open farms are agricultural holdings that welcome visitors and provide direct  
experiences related to farming activities, local traditions, and authentic  
gastronomy. These farms enable consumers to gain first-hand knowledge of how  
food is produced, serving as important educational, social, and economic bridges  
between urban and rural communities.  
In Romania, this practice has expanded considerably since the early 2000s,  
alongside the diversification of rural activities and the development of the  
agritourism sector, particularly in areas with significant natural and cultural  
potential, such as mountainous regions and villages with well-preserved  
traditions. Open farms offer tourists the opportunity to participate in agricultural  
Diversifying Farmers' Livelihoods Through Gastronomy and Tourism Activities  
to Increase Technological, Economic, Environmental and Social Resilience:  
Case Study Sibiu County, Romania  
85  
activities, taste local products, attend craft workshops, and engage in gastronomic  
events. As a result, they contribute to the economic revitalization of rural  
communities, promote rural heritage, and support the preservation of local  
identity.  
Digitalization and Technological Innovation in Rural Tourism in Romania  
Digitalization and technological innovation play a crucial role in the  
transformation of rural tourism in Romania by facilitating the development of  
smart destinations, promoting cultural heritage, and enhancing local attractiveness  
and competitiveness [12,19]. The implementation of digital technologies—from  
mobile applications and online booking systems to virtual reality platforms and  
smart destination management tools—supports service diversification, the  
digitalization of the tourism experience, and the sustainable development of rural  
areas [3, 22].  
Digitalization and technological innovation generate substantial benefits for  
Romanian rural tourism, ranging from the diversification of tourism products and  
the promotion of cultural and natural heritage to increased visitor satisfaction and  
the strengthening of local communities [12,19]. Furthermore, digital tools enable  
rural businesses to improve marketing effectiveness, expand market access, and  
establish direct communication with potential visitors.  
The implementation of integrated digital strategies, investments in digital skills  
and education, and the rapid adoption of emerging technologies have the potential  
to transform Romanian villages into smart, competitive, and sustainable tourism  
destinations [1, 22]. In this context, digitalization represents not only a  
technological advancement but also a strategic instrument for enhancing the  
resilience, visibility, and long-term development of rural areas.  
Fig. 1. Integrating digitalization and technological innovation into gastronomic and tourism  
initiatives in rural areas  
Source: Adapted and synthesized by the authors based on the literature review.  
86  
Mirela Stanciu, Cristina Danciu, Agatha Popescu  
2.Materials and Methods  
In the first stage of the research, a comprehensive review of the scientific  
literature was conducted, focusing on agritourism, rural tourism, farm  
diversification, and farm resilience. To complement the theoretical framework,  
statistical data from official sources were analyzed, including the National  
Institute of Statistics [21], as well as data available at the local level through the  
Sibiu County Tourism Association [28]. The analysis considered indicators such  
as the number of tourist accommodation establishments, accommodation capacity,  
tourist flows, and the average length of stay.  
The second stage of the study was based on field visits, direct observations, and  
discussions with the owners of guesthouses, local gastronomic points, and farms  
open to visitors. In addition, the social media pages of farms in Sibiu County that  
had diversified their agricultural activities through agritourism and local  
gastronomy were examined. This approach enabled the collection of qualitative  
information regarding diversification strategies, visitor engagement, marketing  
practices, and the contribution of these activities to farm resilience and rural  
development.  
3.Results and Discussions  
The results and discussions refer to a case study on diversification of farms  
activities through rural tourism, agritourism, local gastronomic points and opened  
farms in Sibiu County  
3.1 Rural Tourism and Agritourism in Sibiu County  
Sibiu County is among the most dynamic tourist destinations in Romania, owing  
to its remarkable cultural heritage, diverse natural landscape, and well-developed  
tourism infrastructure. Within this complex tourism profile, rural tourism and  
agritourism occupy an important position, contributing significantly to the  
economic development of rural communities and the valorization of local  
traditions.  
The development of rural tourism in the county is further supported by the  
promotion of integrated thematic routes, such as the”Cheese Route”, ”The  
Făgăraș Borderlands Route”, ”The Salt Route”, ”The Nature Route”, and ”The  
Fortifications Route”. These thematic circuits facilitate the coherent promotion of  
local heritage and encourage tourist mobility among different rural settlements.  
The Sibiu County Council also promotes outdoor activities and connections with  
local gastronomy through the”Years of Hiking” program, which offers weekly  
hiking routes guided by local experts and designed to showcase the county’s  
natural and cultural attractions [28].  
Diversifying Farmers' Livelihoods Through Gastronomy and Tourism Activities  
to Increase Technological, Economic, Environmental and Social Resilience:  
Case Study Sibiu County, Romania  
87  
Currently, a total of 519 tourist accommodation establishments are officially  
classified in Sibiu County (see Figure 3a). Of these, 27% are agritourism  
guesthouses, while 14% are tourist guesthouses. Although the number of  
accommodation establishments increased from 428 units in 2021 to 519 units in  
2025, the average length of stay declined from 1.7 days in 2021 to 1.58 days in  
2025.  
The spatial distribution of agritourism and tourist guesthouses highlights three  
distinct tourism areas within the county:  
•
•
•
Area 1 – Very high density, located in the region of Mărginimea Sibiului,  
particularly in the localities of Rășinari, Gura Râului, and Sibiel. Located  
in the mountainous area, the villages capitalize on the well-preserved  
natural and cultural potential, the pastoral tradition of the area and the  
specific gastronomy of Mărginimia Sibiului. The entrepreneurial spirit of  
the locals is noteworthy here.  
Area 2 – High density, situated in Țara Oltului and along the  
Transfăgărășan Corridor, including the localities of Cârțișoara,  
Porumbacu de Sus, and the touristic area of Valea Avrigului. Located at  
the foot of the Făgăraș Mountains, the villages capitalize on the beauty of  
the landscapes, the tradition of extensive ruminant farming, the fishing  
potential of the mountain waters, and local gastronomy.  
Area 3 – Moderate to dispersed density, located in the Târnava Plateau and  
the northern part of the county, including the villages of Moșna and  
Biertan. This area is characterized by tourism experiences focused on  
organic gastronomy and the valorization of cultural heritage, particularly  
the fortified churches.  
These spatial patterns reflect the diversity of tourism resources within Sibiu  
County, ranging from mountain landscapes and traditional rural lifestyles to  
gastronomic experiences and heritage-based tourism. The principal tourism  
indicators for the period 2021–2025 are presented in Table 2.  
Table 2. Main Tourism Indicators for Sibiu County (2021–2025)  
Unit of  
Measurement  
Tourism Indicator  
2021  
428  
2022  
421  
2023  
418  
2024  
484  
2025  
519  
Accommodation establishments Number  
Existing accommodation  
Places  
12,574 12,164 11,675 12,731 13,300  
3,287.4 3,540.9 3,523.8 3,556.1 4,007.4  
capacity  
Accommodation capacity in  
operation  
Thousand place-  
days  
Tourist arrivals  
Overnight stays  
Thousands  
Thousands  
454.9  
776.2  
523.9  
903.6  
578.2  
948.5  
579.6  
936.1  
628.8  
985.9  
Source: [21] (accessed on 25.05.2026)  
88  
Mirela Stanciu, Cristina Danciu, Agatha Popescu  
The main ways of diversifying farm activities in Sibiu County through  
agritourism and gastronomy can be summarized as activities clustered around the  
concept of “Farm-based gastronomy” (see Figure 2).  
Fig.2 Diversifying the activity of farms in Sibiu County through tourism and gastronomy  
Source: Adapted and synthesized by the authors based on the literature review and their own  
observations  
3.2 Local gastronomic points (LGPs)  
LGPs, small family-run establishments serving traditional dishes from local  
ingredients, have proliferated in Romania, especially in mountain regions with  
established tourism infrastructure [7, 32, 33].  
Gastronomy is central to Romania’s rural tourism value proposition, playing a key  
role in destination branding and the creation of memorable tourist  
experiences [10,11]. Digital storytelling and multimodal narratives on social  
media by LGPs have become essential strategies for communicating authenticity,  
local culture, and emotional connections [11].  
LGPs enhance destination image, support local producers, and stimulate rural  
economies by attracting visitors seeking authentic culinary experiences [11, 33].  
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the sector’s flexibility and resilience, but  
Diversifying Farmers' Livelihoods Through Gastronomy and Tourism Activities  
to Increase Technological, Economic, Environmental and Social Resilience:  
Case Study Sibiu County, Romania  
89  
also revealed local administrative deficiencies and a need for improved digital  
marketing and youth engagement [7,11].  
The evolution of the number of LGPs in Sibiu County between 2019-2026  
demonstrates farmers' interest in providing public food services and capitalizing  
on the agricultural raw materials they obtain (see Figure 3, b). It is noted that 57%  
of the total of 46 existing LGPs were established in the last two years [29]. They  
operate in 31 rural localities. The local gastronomic points have a maximum  
capacity of 15 seats, and the menus offered are based on their own production,  
seasonal ingredients, cooked according to recipes specific to the area.  
Fig. 3.a  
Fig. 3.b  
a. Units of accommodation in Sibiu County  
(2021-2025)  
b. Number of the number of LGPs in Sibiu County  
(2019-2026)  
Source: processed by authors based on [21, 29].  
They contribute to: preserving and valorising local products and traditional  
gastronomy; supporting local agriculture and maintaining an authentic lifestyle;  
promoting the cultural heritage of rural communities.  
Two examples of successful gastronomic points are: "Om bun din Alămor" and  
"Cămara Chivuței" in the village of Sadu. The activity of the first LGP is approx.  
6 years old and is based on the host's passion for making homemade bread in a  
traditional oven. This is sold weekly at the "Transilvania" peasant market in Sibiu.  
The farm raises animals, grows vegetables and produces fruit. The farm has two  
accommodation rooms and organizes cart or sleigh rides in the surroundings of  
the town. The promotion of the activity is carried out through social media pages,  
with over 900 followers. The second LGP is approx. 7 years old and is based on  
the host's passion for cooking. The farm grows vegetables, raises animals and  
processes canned vegetables and fruits. The activity is promoted through the  
social media page, which has over 4.7 thousand followers.  
90  
Mirela Stanciu, Cristina Danciu, Agatha Popescu  
3.3 Open Farms for Visitors  
The primary role of farms open to visitors is to provide education and facilitate  
reconnection with nature, while promoting transparency in agricultural activities  
and their social impact, supporting household income, and fostering engagement  
in tourism-related activities.  
Farms open to visitors have multiple roles for the local community and visitors.  
Fig. 4 The role of farms open to visitors  
Source: own’s design.  
Examples of Open Farms in Sibiu County:  
“Bio Moșna” Farm, Moșna  
“Bio Moșna,” located in the village of Moșna, has more than 25 years of  
experience and operates as an organic farm based on a philosophy of complete  
transparency. The family raises dairy cattle and processes the raw milk into a  
variety of artisanal cheeses using recipes and techniques acquired in Switzerland.  
Visitors are invited to explore the vegetable garden and observe the production  
process, while also participating in traditional brunches featuring handcrafted  
cheeses and organic food products.The family has further diversified its activities  
through the development of tourism services, the establishment of a Local  
Gastronomic Point (LGP), and the rental of two guest rooms. Its social media  
presence has attracted more than 10,000 followers.  
“Grădina cu de toate” Farm, Veseud  
“Grădina cu de toate” (“The Garden of Everything”), located in the village of  
Veseud, has been operating since 2019 and focuses on the cultivation of fruits and  
vegetables, which are subsequently processed in a small artisanal workshop.  
Diversifying Farmers' Livelihoods Through Gastronomy and Tourism Activities  
to Increase Technological, Economic, Environmental and Social Resilience:  
Case Study Sibiu County, Romania  
91  
Visitors can participate in guided tours of the family’s gardens, receive  
information on the benefits of consuming fresh produce, and take part in product  
tastings.The farm’s products are marketed directly on-site, through retail outlets in  
the cities of Sibiu and Brașov, and via online orders. Since 2024, the family has  
also established a Local Gastronomic Point (LGP). The farm maintains an active  
presence on social media, where it has attracted more than 2,500 followers.  
Conclusions  
(1) The diversification of farmers’ livelihoods through gastronomy and rural  
tourism activities represents a rural development strategy that capitalizes on local  
resources to generate additional income, reduce dependence on traditional  
agriculture, and enhance the resilience of rural communities to technological,  
economic, environmental, and social changes. This diversification encompasses  
the development of rural tourism and agritourism, the promotion of local  
gastronomic products, the organization of food fairs and culinary events, and the  
involvement of women and other vulnerable groups in new economic activities.  
(2) The diversification of farm activities through agritourism and local  
gastronomy constitutes a strategy for directly improving farmers’ quality of life,  
transforming farm households characterized by intensive physical labor and  
seasonal incomes into stable, multifunctional, and community-oriented  
enterprises.  
(3) The main benefits of farm diversification include strengthening the economic  
position of farms, preserving and valorizing natural and cultural heritage, creating  
employment opportunities, reinforcing social cohesion in rural areas, safeguarding  
traditions and transmitting them to future generations, improving local  
infrastructure, and enhancing the attractiveness of rural areas through investment  
and tourism development.  
(4) The environmental resilience of farms can be strengthened through the  
development of community-oriented services and short supply chains. Social  
resilience is enhanced through the active involvement of farms in the provision of  
social, educational, and food-related services in partnership with local authorities  
and communities. Economic resilience can be reinforced through the efficient  
management of natural capital, the adoption of diversification strategies, the  
assessment of real production costs, and the integration of green economy  
principles and digital tools.  
(5) The literature demonstrates that rural tourism and local gastronomy in  
Romania are interdependent drivers of sustainable development, cultural  
preservation, and economic growth in rural areas. This is also evidenced in the  
case of farm diversification in Sibiu County, where more than 200  
92  
Mirela Stanciu, Cristina Danciu, Agatha Popescu  
accommodation establishments are classified in rural areas and 46 local  
gastronomic points have been established.  
(6) Farmers are custodians of national culture. Oral traditions and folklore:  
agricultural communities are often the source of proverbs, folk songs, seasonal  
rituals, and local knowledge. These cultural assets are transmitted from one  
generation to the next alongside agricultural practices and skills. Connection to  
the land: national identity is deeply rooted in the landscape. Through their  
stewardship of the land, farmers preserve the historical and geographical character  
of a country. Culinary heritage: farmers play a fundamental role in conserving  
regional food systems, local breeds and crop varieties, traditional food cultures,  
and customary cooking methods. These elements constitute the foundation of a  
nation’s gastronomy and food identity. Social cohesion: rural communities foster  
strong networks of mutual support, community festivals, and shared values,  
thereby contributing to social solidarity and cultural continuity.  
R E F E R E N C E S  
[1] Asimiadis, D., Manglis, A., & Tzovaras, D., Fostering Sustainable Development Through  
Cultural and Creative Tourism in Rural and Remote Areas, in: Katsoni, V., Costa, C. (eds)  
Innovation and Creativity in Tourism, Business and Social Sciences. IACuDiT 2024.  
Springer  
Proceedings  
in  
Business  
and  
Economics.  
Springer,  
Cham.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78471-2_33, 2025.  
[2] Bacter, R.V., Gherdan, A.E.M., Dodu, M.A., Ciolac, R., Iancu, T., Pârvulescu, L., Brata,  
A.M., Ungureanu, A., Bolovan (Cociorva), R., Chebeleu, I.C., The Influence of Legislative  
and Economic Conditions on Romanian Agritourism: SWOT Study of Northwestern and  
Northeastern Regions and Sustainable Development Strategies, Sustainability, 16(17), 7382;  
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177382, 2024.  
[3] Briciu, A., Briciu, V.A., Kavoura A., Evaluating How 'Smart' Brasov, Romania Can Be  
Virtually via a Mobile Application for Cultural Tourism. Sustainability, 12(13), 5324;  
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135324, 2020.  
[4] Cáceres, O.I.M., García, S.R., New actors in rural development and social innovations: the  
case of peri-urban areas in Madrid and Guadalajara (Spain), AIBR- Revista de Antropologia  
Iberoamericana, DOI: 10.11156/aibr.130307, 2018.  
[5] Cano, D.C., & Azkarraga, L.U., Short marketing channels for rural dynamization: analysis  
from political agroecology. Scripta Nova-Revista Electronica de Geografia y Ciencias  
Sociales, 29(1):245-270, 10.1344/sn2025.29.46377, 2025.  
[6] Cavalleri, S.A.E., Tanwattana, P., Gruenbuehel, C.M., Systemizing a rural livelihood  
diversification framework for sustainable community-based agritourism: A participatory  
approach  
to  
ensure  
resilience.  
Front.  
Sustain.  
Food  
Syst.  
6:993892.  
doi:  
10.3389/fsufs.2022.993892 2022.  
Diversifying Farmers' Livelihoods Through Gastronomy and Tourism Activities  
to Increase Technological, Economic, Environmental and Social Resilience:  
Case Study Sibiu County, Romania  
93  
[7] Chivu, M., Stanciu, S., Promoting Romania's culinary heritage. Case study: local gastronomic  
points. Scientific Papers-Series Management Economic Engineering in Agriculture and  
Rural Development, 24(1), 203-211, 2024.  
[8] de Paredes, O.R.M., Profitability of agricultural production from the perspective of real costs:  
municipalities of Pueblo Llano and Rangel of Merida state, Venezuela. Vision Gerencial, 2,  
217-232, 2017.  
[9] de Sousa, R.A.D., The European common agricultural policy against regulation 834/2007: The  
Relationship with other countries, Espacio Abierto, 2020.  
[10] Dobre, C.A., Iorga, A.M., Stoicea, P., Authentic Romanian and rural tourism in the Sub-  
carpathian Muntenia area. Original case study "Satul Banului guest house". Scientific  
Papers-Series Management Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development,  
22(2), 293-300, 2022.  
[11] Homeghi, A.F., Ivasciuc, I. S., Ispas, A., Gastronomy as a Vector of Online Regional  
Branding: The Digital Communication of Gastronomic Experiences Within the "Gastro  
Local"  
Network,  
Brasov  
County,  
Romania.  
Sustainability,  
17(24),  
11332,  
https://doi.org/10.3390/su172411332, 2025.  
[12] Ionescu, A.M., Sârbu F.A., Exploring the Impact of Smart Technologies on the Tourism  
Industry, Sustainability, 16(8), 3318; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083318, 2024.  
[13] Jurjevic, Z., Zekic, S., Dokic, D., Sustainability of Small Farms in Serbia: A Comparative  
Analysis  
with  
the  
European  
Union.  
Agronomy-Basel,  
12(11),  
2026.  
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112726, 2022.  
[14] Kimbu, A.N., Booyens, I., Winchenbach, A., Livelihood diversification through tourism:  
identity, well-being, and potential in rural coastal communities, Tourism Review  
International, 26 (1). pp. 25-40, 2022.  
[15] Kostas, A., Zoumpoulidis, V., & Karasavvoglou, A., Social and Solidarity Economy and  
Social Innovation in the Agri-Food Sector: A Conceptual Synthesis of Contributions to  
Sustainable Local and Rural Development, Social Sciences-Basel, 15(4), 248;  
https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15040248, 2026.  
[16] Lankauskiene, R., Simonaityte, V., Gedminaite-Raudone, Z., Sustainable Culinary Tourism  
Pathways in the Baltic Sea Region: A Comparative Perspective. Sustainability, 17(23),  
10472;https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310472 , 2025.  
[17] Mănescu, C., Cristina, A.-F., Sicoa-Murg, O., Găvruța, A., Mateoc, T., Toth, A., Mateoc-  
Sîrb, N., Analysis of the importance of agriculture sector in Romanian economy, Scientific  
Papers-Series Management Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development,  
16(1), 271-277, 2016.  
[18] Melnyk, V., Nadvynychnyy, S., Pohrishchuk, B., Pohrishchuk, O., Economic Administration  
of Agricultural Sector Development in the Concept of "Natural Capital", Revista  
Administracao em Dialogo, vol.27, 152-167, 2025.  
[19] Moise, G., Popescu, A., Bratu, I.A, Răducuță, R., Nistoreanu, B.G., Stanciu, M., Can We  
Talk about Smart Tourist Villages in Marginimea Sibiului, Romania? Sustainability, 15(9),  
7475; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097475, 2023  
[20] Morariu (Rusu), L., Marcuta, A., Tudor, V.C., Micu, M, M, Preda, M., Marcuta, L.,  
Analysis of the interdependence between food consumption and the development of  
94  
Mirela Stanciu, Cristina Danciu, Agatha Popescu  
gastronomic tourism in Romania, Scientific Papers-Series Management Economic  
Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 25(3), 665-674, 2025.  
[21] National Institute of Statistics, Tempo Online, Tourism (accessed on 25 of May 2026).  
[22] Nazare, A.K., Moldoveanu, A., Moldoveanu Florica, Virtual Journeys, Real Engagement:  
Analyzing User Experience on a Virtual Travel Social Platform. Information, 15(7), 396;  
https://doi.org/10.3390/info15070396, 2024.  
[23] Novikova, M., Transformative social innovation in rural areas: insights from a rural  
development initiative in the Portuguese region of Baixo Alentejo, European Countryside,  
13(1), 71-90, DOI: 10.2478/euco-2021-0005, 2021.  
[24] Oltean, R.C., Chifor, C., Isarie, V., Arion. I., Mureșan, I., Arion, F.H., Environmental and  
agrifood cultural tradition preservation as part of rural tourism. A systematic literature  
review in Romania, Scientific Papers-Series Management Economic Engineering in  
Agriculture and Rural Development, 23(2), 501-516, 2023.  
[25] Preda, M., Vijulie, I., Vânău, G., Mareci, A., Tudoricu, A., The Heritage Paradox: When  
Tourism Turns the Idyllic into the Mercantile in Rural Transylvania, Heritage, 9(1), 9;  
https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage9010009, 2025.  
[26] Prigoreanu, I., Radu, G., Ignat, G., Assessing the Economic Sustainability of the EU and  
Romanian  
Farming  
Sectors.  
Sustainability,  
17(10),  
4440;  
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104440, 2025.  
[27] Rahoveanu, M.M.T., Soare, I., & Sorcaru I., Traditional food technologies opportunity to  
increase the competitiveness of agriculture, Romanian Biotechnological Letters,  
21(5):11959-11967, 2016.  
[28] Sibiu County Council, Hiking Program, https://aniidrumetiei.ro/en/about-us/ (accessed on 25  
of May 2026)  
[29] Sibiu Veterinary Health Directorate: Local Gastronomic Points (accessed on 25 of May  
2026).  
[30] Soare, I., Zugravu, C.L., Zugravu G.A., Research on Consumer Perception Regarding  
Traditional  
Food  
Products  
of  
Romania.  
Foods,  
12(14),  
2723;  
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12142723 2023.  
[31] Sotilo, C., Luderer, C., CSA: An Agroecology Program in Portugal and its Cultural Codes  
ARC: un programa de agroecologia en Portugal y sus codigos culturales, Rivar-Revista  
Iberoamericana  
de  
Viticultura  
Agroindustria  
y
Ruralidad,  
vol.9 no.26,  
http://dx.doi.org/10.35588/rivar.v9i26.5516, 2022.  
[32] Stanciu, M., Danciu, C.A., Popescu, A., Vecerdea, P., Gaspar, E., Bratu, I.A., Gastronomic  
and tourism-based valorization of trout farm resources in the mountainous rural areas: a case  
study of the Țara Făgărașului region, Romania, Scientific Papers-Series Management  
Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 26(1), 897-910, 2026.  
[33] Stanciu, M., Danciu, C.A., Pop-David, A., Antonie, I., Local gastronomic points-a tool for  
sustainable value chain in rural tourism from Romania. Scientific Papers-Series  
Management Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 25(3), 817-828,  
2025.  
Diversifying Farmers' Livelihoods Through Gastronomy and Tourism Activities  
to Increase Technological, Economic, Environmental and Social Resilience:  
Case Study Sibiu County, Romania  
95  
[34] Stanciu, M., Popescu, A., Stanciu C., Rural tourism, agrotourism and ecotourism in  
Romania: current research status and future trends, Scientific Papers-Series Management  
Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 23(1), 745-757, 2023.  
[35] Tănase, M.O., Nistoreanu, P., Dina, R., Georgescu, B., Nicula, V., Mirea, C.N., Generation Z  
Romanian Students' Relation with Rural Tourism-An Exploratory Study, Sustainability,  
15(10), 8166; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108166 , 2023.  
[36] Velázquez-Torres, A.L., Martínez-Castañeda, F.E., & Thomé-Ortiz, H., Sustainability and  
Competitiveness of Mexican Rose Production for Export: A Policy Analysis Matrix  
Approach Assessing Economic and Social Dimensions. Sustainability, 17(24), 11289;  
https://doi.org/10.3390/su172411289 2025.  
[37] Vîrlan, A.I., Bobeica, M., & Beciu, S., Wine, culture and connection: exploring the  
opportunities of wine tourism in Romania, Scientific Papers-Series Management Economic  
Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 25(2), 913-924, 2025.  
[38] Yusriadi, Y., 2025, Building rural resilience: food security through tourism and agricultural  
development in Indonesia, Discov Appl Sci 7, 1272, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-  
07763-y 2025.